An analysis of niccolo machiavelli and thomas hobbes works on politics and human nature

Nonetheless, in severing politics from metaphysics, and in affirming that popular support and consent are the true foundations of political authority both thinkers offer distinctly modern views of politics.

Differences and similarities in the political thought of Thomas Hobbes and Niccoló Machiavelli

Machiavelli felt that it was misguided to feel that the successes of ancient Rome could not be repeated in contemporary times Machiavelli He will see innumerable cruelties follow in Rome, and nobility, riches, past honors, and, above all, virtue imputed as capital sins.

Thus for Machiavelli, people organize in cities primarily for protection Machiavelli, But he cites Plato and Aristotle very infrequently and apparently did not approve of them. This includes the Catholic Counter Reformation writers summarised by Bireley: The pretext of defending Church interests was used as a partial justification by the Borgias.

Machiavelli is the only political thinker whose name has come into common use for designating a kind of politics, which exists and will continue to exist independently of his influence, a politics guided exclusively by considerations of expediency, which uses all means, fair or foul, iron or poison, for achieving its ends—its end being the aggrandizement of one's country or fatherland—but also using the fatherland in the service of the self-aggrandizement of the politician or statesman or one's party.


Though the laws of nature are not inviolate in Hobbes, and take the form of suggestions rather than cardinal rules, they are intended to lead to behaviour that abides by the right of nature which is itself, according to Hobbes, inalienable.

This would allow the prince to govern without being morally bound. In these three plays Shakespeare interrogates the orthodox account of the natural order. Influence[ edit ] To quote Robert Bireley: Southern Illinois University Press, Machiavelli, Hobbes, for instance, are altogether less confident than ancient and medieval thinkers that criminal or sinful behavior leads to ruin.

Wherefore should I Stand in the plague of custom and permit The curiosity of nations to deprive me For that I am some twelve or fourteen moonshines Lag of a brother?

What Was Machiavelli's View Of Human Nature

According to Strausspp. The state for Shakespeare was the response and remedy to human mortality. However, as of Oct. Machiavelli discourages action to taken otherwise " Aristotle investigates a number of different areas before drawing conclusions.

Shakespeare between Machiavelli and Hobbes: Dead Body Politics

He instead understands the capacity to wield material force to be a much more important measure of whether or not states succeed or fail. For example, Leo Straussp.

On The State of Politics and Human Nature

They are not what they seem to be. Henry has learned of a plot against his life, and rather than merely have the traitors imprisoned and executed, he makes a show of taking them into his confidence, and then gives them their commissions, in writing, which actually reveal that they have been discovered.

Often he makes similar kinds of pairings and arguments. If we do not take this portrait of lovers accosted in the woods seriously due to its appearance within a comedy, we might consider how similar it is to the more sinister depiction we get in Titus Andronicus.Hobbes and Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were both great political philosophers of their times.

Even though they lived in different eras, these men both produced works that would be considered highly influential on the formation of political theory and philosophy. Machiavelli's view of human nature was not in accord to that of humanists who felt that an individual could greatly contribute to the well being of the society.

Machiavelli, however felt that people generally tended to work for their own best interests and gave little obligation to the well being of the state. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were philosophers who produced influential works on politics and human nature.

Hobbes was best known for his publications on individual security and the social contract, while Machiavelli was a writer, statesman The first great political philosopher of the Renaissance was Nicolo Machiavelli (). Thomas Hobbes (/ h ɒ b z /; 5 April – 4 December ), in some older texts Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, was an English philosopher who is considered one of.

Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are important political philosophers of their time. The philosophers share similar negative views on the human nature. These negative views of human nature are reflected in their views of government, politics, and the treatment of citizens.

Niccolò Machiavelli

Nov 15,  · **Image: Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke Rousseau agrees with Hobbes and Locke that the notion that the state of nature entails equality, stating that “The State of Nature has a Law of Nature to govern it, which obliges everyone” (Locke ).

An analysis of niccolo machiavelli and thomas hobbes works on politics and human nature
Rated 0/5 based on 79 review